OBAMACARE PART 2: OBAMACARE WEBSITE ISSUES WILL BE FIXED, PRESIDENT PROMISES
The U.S. government has 'no excuse' for the problems that have plagued HealthCare.gov, the president says
President Obama promises Monday that the ailing HealthCare.gov website will be fixed. (Photo: Screenshot)
OCTOBER 28, 2013 (Computerworld) By Grant Gross - POSTED October 21, 2013 - IDG News Service - More than a half million U.S. residents have signed up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act despite ongoing problems with HealthCare.gov, one of the main ways to shop for the new health plans, President Obama said Monday.
U.S. President Barack Obama President Obama promises Monday that the ailing HealthCare.gov website will be fixed. (Photo: Screenshot)
There is "no excuse" for the problems that have plagued HealthCare.gov since the site went live Oct. 1, Obama added during a speech. He promised the problems with the website being slow and users being unable to complete their applications would be fixed, with the administration bringing in some of the "best IT talent" in the U.S. as part of a so-called tech surge announced Sunday.
"Nobody's madder than me about the fact that the website isn't working as well as it should, which means it's gonna get fixed," Obama said. "Everybody who wants insurance through the marketplace will get insurance. Period."
Obama's speech came as The New York Times, quoting anonymous contractors working on the website, said it may take weeks before HealthCare.gov is working properly.
Obama didn't break down where the more than 500,000 U.S. residents who've signed up for health insurance completed their applications. In addition to HealthCare.gov, residents can sign up for insurance under the so-called Obamacare law through the phone and in person at community health centers and hospitals, and 16 states are operating their own health insurance marketplaces.
HealthCare.gov has had nearly 20 million visitors since Oct. 1, Obama said.
The Department of Health and Human Services has hired more phone operators to staff call centers for people who want to sign up over the phone, Obama said. The agency will also contact people who've tried to sign up for insurance on the website and have encountered problems, he said.
U.S. residents without health insurance still have more than five months to sign up for health insurance in an open enrollment period, Obama noted. Many people who've signed up have been able to buy insurance for the first time or have saved hundreds of dollars a month in premiums, he said. One Pennsylvania man wrote Obama that he and his wife will save about $900 a month by buying insurance through Obamacare.
"The product -- the health insurance -- is good," Obama said. "The prices are good. It is a good deal. People don't just want it, they're showing up to buy it."
While much of the criticism of Obamacare has focused on the website problems, the 2010 law is not "just about a website," he said.
White House spokesman Jay Carney faced dozens of questions about HealthCare.gov during his Monday afternoon press briefing. The White House isn't focused on rehashing what went wrong with the site -- what Carney called "Monday morning quarterbacking" -- but on fixing the problems going forward, he said.
Carney declined to explain what technology problems led to the website issues, but said higher-than-expected traffic in the first days of the live site has "driven and exposed problems."
"Demand for quality, affordable health insurance is exceedingly high, and we need to step up our game to assure that demand is met," he said.
Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Healthcare.gov website 'didn't have a chance in hell' By Patrick Thibodeau October 21, 2013 04:14 PM ET
The failure rate for software development projects is high generally, particularly large ones like Healthcare.gov, says Standish Group data
A busy screen is shown on the laptop of a Certified Application Counselor as he attempted to enroll an interested person for Affordable Care Act insurance, known as 'Obamacare,' at the Borinquen Medical Center in Miami Oct. 2, 2013. Joe Skipper/Reuters
WASHINGTON -- A majority of large IT projects fail to meet deadlines, are over budget and don't make their users happy. Such is the case with Healthcare.gov.
The U.S. is now racing to fix Healthcare.gov, the Affordability Care Act (ACA) website that launched Oct 1, by bringing in new expertise to fix it.
Healthcare.gov's problems include site availability due to excessive loads, incorrect data recording among other things.
President Barack Obama said Monday that there is "no excuse" for the problems at the site.
But his IT advisors shouldn't be surprised -- the success rate for large, multi-million dollar commercial and government IT projects is very low.
The Standish Group, which has a database of some 50,000 development projects, looked at the outcomes of multimillion dollar development projects and ran the numbers for Computerworld.
Of 3,555 projects from 2003 to 2012 that had labor costs of at least $10 million, only 6.4% were successful. The Standish data showed that 52% of the large projects were "challenged," meaning they were over budget, behind schedule or didn't meet user expectations. The remaining 41.4% were failures -- they were either abandoned or started anew from scratch.
"They didn't have a chance in hell," said Jim Johnson, founder and chairman of Standish, of Healthcare.gov. "There was no way they were going to get this right - they only had a 6% chance," he said.
But Johnson said he does believe the project is fixable, and doesn't see the rollout problems as "life threatening at this point."
The healthcare.gov contractor was initially awarded more than $93 million for the project, but costs have been soaring above that.
Large state and federal government IT projects are notorious for blowing up.
Just last year, the U.S. Air Force said it was scrapping implementation of an ERP project that had already cost it $1 billion.
Earlier project disasters include the FBI's abandonment of a $170 million virtual case initiative, and its decision to start over with a new project that cost $425 million. Also, the U.S. Census Dept.'s automation efforts became a boondoggle, with big cost overruns. An Orange County, Calif., tax system modernization project that began with 6,000 pages of specifications was declared "fatally flawed" this year.
Large commercial IT projects face the same problems. Even the just released Windows 8.1 release is has been hit with problems.
Software development experts and analysts point to multiple issues as the potential cause of such problems.
The "most dangerous" of all failure points for a software development project is the "big bang" release, the approach the government took by releasing the ACA site on Oct. 1 release, said Johnson.
Other sources of problems, said Johnson, could be too many changes made along the way, and too much bureaucracy. Slow moving government and contractor designers and developers can stymie or slow projects.
Many large projects are rolled out slowly and incrementally to allow extended testing and feedback, said Johnson.
Healthcare.gov isn't just a website -- it has lots of interactions and interdependencies with other agencies and private sector firms, said Lev Lesokhin, senior vice president at Cast, a software analysis and measurement firm. He said he wouldn't be surprised if the website has 500,000 lines of code.
Developing specifications correctly for such a complex design is a common problem, said Lesokhin.
Another is sourcing, he said. Multiple parties have worked on Healthcare.gov, which makes it more difficult to manage than an agile and incremental effort in projects where the developers are all in one place.
Technical oversight by a team that has responsibility for all interdependencies is another need. "Clearly we are seeing the symptoms that that was not put in place," said Lesokhin, of the technical oversight.
For all its issues, Healthcare.gov is still managing to help some people.
Anthony Franco, president of EffectiveUI, an application development firm, said that most large organizations would call the project a success at this point. "You are fundamentally solving a problem that hasn't been solved before," he said.
Forrester, in a research report commission by EffectiveUI and released last week, found that only 39% of business decision makers believe their internal IT organization has the ability to regularly deliver projects on-time and budget. That's more than Standish found, but the Forrester report a higher number that Standish figure, but the survey referred to IT projects of all sizes.
Jerry Luftman, executive director of the Global Institute for IT Management, said the 39% in the Forrester survey is a big improvement from a few years ago. He credited the improvement with a shift to mobile apps and agile development for the improvement.
Patrick Thibodeau covers SaaS and enterprise applications, outsourcing, government IT policies, data centers and IT workforce issues for Computerworld. Follow Patrick on Twitter at Twitter@DCgov, or subscribe to Patrick's RSS feed Thibodeau RSS. His email address is email@example.com.