PRESIDENT TO SIGN BUDGET 2014 BEFORE CHRISTMAS

The lawmakers want to create a P15-20 billion fund for the rehabilitation of areas ravaged by Super typhoon Yolanda. It will be on top of the P14.6-billion supplemental budget sourced from the unused Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) declared by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional. The House passed the supplemental budget but the Senate has yet to come up with its own version.

ALSO: High Court won’t touch DAP case until February

The Supreme Court (SC) is inclined to postpone for next year a ruling on the President’s Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), part of which is alleged to have been used to bribe senators to convict Chief Justice Renato Corona during his impeachment trial. An unimpeachable source in the Supreme Court told The Manila Times there is a recommendation to postpone the oral arguments on a restraining order blocking the fund releases from the DAP scheduled on December 10. The DAP releases triggered accusations that they were used as a bribe for the lawmakers to oust Corona.

ALSO: Aquino used agrarian reform funds as pork barrel

It wasn’t just money from the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF)—the official pork-barrel kitty—and later from the Disbursement Acceleration Plan (DAP) that President Aquino used to bribe senators for their support, especially for the impeachment of Chief Justice Renato Corona. Aquino even converted as pork-barrel funds money from the Agrarian Reform Fund (ARF), set up way back in 1987 and sourced from the proceeds of the sale to private groups of government assets and the recovery of the so-called ill-gotten wealth of the Marcos couple and their cronies.


PRESIDENT TO SIGN BUDGET 2014 BEFORE CHRISTMAS

MANILA, DECEMBER 9, 2013 (MANILA TIMES) The 2014 national budget will be approved by Congress and signed by President Benigno Aquino 3rd before December 23, a lawmaker said on Sunday.

Davao City Rep. Isidro T. Ungab, the House Committee on Appropriations chairman, said the P2.268-trillion General Appropriations Act is expected to hurdle the bicameral meeting before Congress takes its Christmas break on December 23.

The President will sign the budget two days before Christmas, just in time for its effectivity on January 1.

Ungab said they have no objections to opening the bicameral committee deliberations to the public as a response to an online petition in Change.Org calling for transparency.

“No problem, we have nothing to hide. We support the government’s campaign for more transparency,” he said.

Ungab and his counterpart, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Francis Escudero, said the bicam panel will meet on Tuesday at the Senate and Wednesday at the House.

Ungab said the Congress is finishing the reports for the bicameral committee meeting.

“Both House and Senate staff are working overtime to finish the inputs for bicameral conference committee.

They are actually almost done and could finish it by Monday so we can proceed with the bicameral conference committee meeting on Tuesday,” Ungab said.

The lawmakers want to create a P15-20 billion fund for the rehabilitation of areas ravaged by Super typhoon Yolanda.

It will be on top of the P14.6-billion supplemental budget sourced from the unused Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) declared by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional.

The House passed the supplemental budget but the Senate has yet to come up with its own version.
JHOANNA BALLARAN

FROM THE MANILA TIMES

High Court won’t touch DAP case until February December 8, 2013 9:29 pm by JOMAR CANLAS SENIOR REPORTER

MANILA - The Supreme Court (SC) is inclined to postpone for next year a ruling on the President’s Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), part of which is alleged to have been used to bribe senators to convict Chief Justice Renato Corona during his impeachment trial.

An unimpeachable source in the Supreme Court told The Manila Times there is a recommendation to postpone the oral arguments on a restraining order blocking the fund releases from the DAP scheduled on December 10.

A draft resolution circulated among the Supreme Court justices on Friday afternoon recommended that the oral arguments be rescheduled to February of next year.

This means that the plea for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against DAP could be rendered moot.

The Court starts its Christmas recess on December 16.

A TRO would have prevented the President from realigning funds from one branch of government to another.

Several petitions are calling on the Supreme Court to freeze DAP disbursements after Malacañang admitted it released part of the fund to some senators during and after the Corona trial.

The DAP releases triggered accusations that they were used as a bribe for the lawmakers to oust Corona.

Former Rep. Augusto Syjuco Jr. of Iloilo and several other petitioners asked the Supreme Court to stop the government from tapping the DAP for funds to assist areas in the Bohol and Cebu devastated by a 7.2-magnitude earthquake.

Similar petitions against DAP were filed by Philippine Constitution Association (Philconsa), former Councilor Greco Belgica of Manila and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines.

The IBP argued there is no allocation for DAP in the General Appropriations Acts (GAA) of 2011, 2012, and 2013.
The Palace admitted it disbursed DAP funds to 19 senators, 18 of whom voted to convict Corona in May 2012.

Aquino used agrarian reform funds as pork barrel December 8, 2013 9:20 pm MANILA TIMES BY RIGOBERTO TIGLAO (photo)

More and more, President Aquino seems to deserve the Pork Barrel King moniker.

It wasn’t just money from the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF)—the official pork-barrel kitty—and later from the Disbursement Acceleration Plan (DAP) that President Aquino used to bribe senators for their support, especially for the impeachment of Chief Justice Renato Corona.

Aquino even converted as pork-barrel funds money from the Agrarian Reform Fund (ARF), set up way back in 1987 and sourced from the proceeds of the sale to private groups of government assets and the recovery of the so-called ill-gotten wealth of the Marcos couple and their cronies.

Booked in the government’s accounting system as “Fund 158,” the ARF money is administered by the Land Bank of the Philippines, and intended mainly for the comprehensive agrarian reform program. It is money basically for peasants.

Sources from the budget department and the Commission on Audit claimed that Aquino could have used about P700 million of the ARF as pork-barrel funds in 2011 and 2012, a big chunk of which ended up in lawmakers’ pockets through “Napoles-type” of scams.


Letter from 2011 Chairman of Senate Finance Committee F. M. Drilon to Sen. Gregorio Honasan transmtting a copy of a P100 million SARO under DAR.

They were referring to the alleged operations of the now infamous Janet Lim-Napoles to siphon pork-barrel funds to fake NGOs, by which lawmakers got part of the money as kickbacks.

Use of ARF money illegal

The use by Aquino of these huge ARF sums however is illegal not only because of one reason the Supreme Court recently gave in declaring all pork barrel funds unconstitutional, which is that lawmakers cannot be involved in the expenditure of the government budget.

More clearly, Aquino’s the use of ARF funds was because these had been released without resolutions by the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council’s Executive Committee, as required by law. The budget department cannot just on its own take money from the ARF; the transaction has to be approved by that committee.

The agrarian reform secretary chairs this committee, whose other members are the Executive Secretary, the secretaries of the departments of agriculture, environment and natural resources, finance, public works and highways as well as the chairman of the Land Bank of the Philippines.

In a full-blown investigation, each of these officials would have to choose whether to lie for Aquino or tell the truth that they didn’t approve or sign any resolution for such use of the funds.

The sources claimed that the P220 million that Agrarian Reform Undersecretary Anthony Parungao recently claimed had been endorsed by Senators Jinggoy Estrada and Gregorio Honasan and released to fund nonexistent “agrarian reform projects” by dubious nongovernment agencies was just a part of the total ARF funds that Aquino used as pork-barrel money.

“It was clearly Budget Secretary Florencio Abad’s idea, as he was familiar with these funds when he was agrarian reform secretary under Cory [President Corazon],” a source said. He probably thought the use of some of these ARF funds, as pork barrel would escape scrutiny.

A COA audit, contained in its Audit Observation Memorandum dated March 25, 2013, concluded that about P170 million of the P220 million was disbursed to fake NGOs, seven of which had been identified as fronts of Napoles by his employee Benhur Luy.

These were supposed to be spent for projects undertaken by “agrarian reform communities” mainly (and strangely) for vermi-composting (the use of certain worms to compost waste without using chemicals) and the distribution of fertilizers and chemicals to farmers.

Ghost projects

A field investigation by the COA, however, found no such projects implemented or being implemented. The mayors who were supposed to be partners in the projects were totally unaware of them.

The sources so far provided actual documents however solely in the case of such projects “endorsed” by Sen. Gregorio Honasan.

Obviously in response to Honasan’s request, Sen. Franklin Drilon, then the chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Finance who allegedly was Aquino’s liaison man in that body to distribute pork-barrel funds of any type, sent an official letter to Honasan, dated February 15, 2011 which read: (see page 1)

Attached to Drilon’s letter was a photocopy of Special Allotment Release Order No. E-11-00282 darted February 8, 2011 for the amount of P100 million. The SARO was signed by Budget Undersecretary Mario L. Relampagos, with the note. “By Authority of the Secretary.”

The SARO indicated the fund code: 158, which means it was drawn from the Agrarian Reform Fund, and not from the PDAF, which is a separate item in the appropriations laws.

The COA and the agrarian reform undersecretary for legal affairs followed the paper trail on the use of the P100 million, and undertook actual investigations, and found that the bulk of the money was released to fake NGOs for nonexistent projects.

“What is strange though is why only documents involving Jinggoy and Honasan’s pork barrel from ARF funds are being released by the agrarian reform department,” a budget department source said. Several other senators, including those in Aquino’s camp had availed of this ARF ‘pork-barrel,’ the source added.

Aquino and the Senate apparently had concluded an agreement in late 2010, that for the body to be really supportive, especially of the President’s unprecedented plot to take out Chief Justice Corona that year, the regular PDAF of P200 million yearly for each senator wasn’t enough.

After all the senators thought they had a right to it as they make the budget law, and without that PDAF, there wouldn’t be a budget law.

Being a former agrarian reform secretary, Abad knew that the ARF could be tapped as pork barrel funds. But Abad—and probably Relampagos—later thought that the easier way would be to get money from various departments, by simply declaring some of their allocations as “savings.”

As a smokescreen, they used such dubious “savings” for other projects they preferred, and called such impounding and utilization of funds allocated by the budget laws as “Disbursement Acceleration Plan.”

Instead, that scheme, when the Supreme Court rules it as unconstitutional, would probably accelerate the unraveling of Aquino’s regime.

tiglao.manilatimes@gmail.com

www.trigger.ph

www.rigobertotiglao.com


Chief News Editor: Sol Jose Vanzi

© Copyright, 2013 by PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE
All rights reserved


PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE [PHNO] WEBSITE