NANI ARRAIGNED ON 2 CRIMINAL CHARGES MAY 21
MANILA, MAY 9, 2008 (STAR) Former justice secretary Hernando Perez will be arraigned on May 21 on two criminal charges linked to the $2-million extortion case filed against him by former Manila representative Mark Jimenez.The Sandiganbayan fourth division ordered Perez to appear in court at 8:30 a.m. to enter his plea on charges of violating Republic Act 6713, Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Government Officials and Employees, and section 7 of Republic Act 3019, the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.
Perez has already been notified about the arraignment schedule, according to the division clerk of court.
The fourth division is chaired by Associate Justice Gregory Ong, with Associate Justice Jose Hernandez as lone member.
Two other Sandiganbayan divisions handling other cases against Perez had already set his arraignment and those of his wife, Rosario, brother-in-law Ramon Arceo and business associate Ernest Escaler.
The first division had scheduled their arraignment on violation of section 3-B of RA 3019 on May 16.
The second division has reset to May 23 the arraignment of Perez and his three co-accused on charges of robbery/extortion (violation Article 294 in relation to Article 293 of the Revised Penal Code) after his wife failed to attend the arraignment last Monday.
The third division, which handles the falsification of public document charges against Perez, has yet to set the date for his arraignment.
Earlier, lawyers of the Perez couple, led by Marcial Balgos, filed a motion to quash charges and sought the suspension of arraignment in all four divisions of the Sandiganbayan pending resolution of their appeals with the Supreme Court.
Associate Justice Edilberto Sandoval, Second Division chairman, said arraignment is not part of the trial and that there would be no conflict in case the SC ruled in favor of the Perezes.
The case at the Sandiganbayan could be dismissed upon order of the Supreme Court even after the arraignment, he added. – Edu Punay
Nene seeks accounting of funds spent for CARP By Aurea Calica Thursday, May 8, 2008
Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr. is seeking a full accounting of the tens of billions of pesos spent for the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) since it was first implemented in 1988 in view of allegations about corruption and misuse of money.
At the same time, he said the issue of funding should be resolved first before Congress could decide on the extension of CARP which expires on June 10.
Pimentel said there had been no accounting of the public money allocated for CARP, including the P28 billion from the Marcos bank deposits recovered from Switzerland.
He said the administration had not yet fully responded to the allegations by farmers’ organizations that part of the recovered Marcos bank deposits had been diverted to the 2004 election campaign of President Arroyo.
“We have to ascertain that public funds that were appropriated for CARP are duly accounted for. And we do not see that yet because every time the CARP is in danger of extinction, they just come back to say we need more money to keep CARP alive,” he said.
Pimentel said that during the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines-Legislators’ forum which he attended, it was revealed that the Supreme Court had upheld a lower court decision to pay a huge landowner P1 billion as just compensation for a tract of land covered by CARP.
He said the Supreme Court, in two separate cases, also ordered the payment of P1 billion to one corporate landowner and P122 million to another.
“This is terrible. With that kind of money being paid to big landowners, how can you sustain the CARP?” Pimentel said.
The concept of just compensation must be different for the agrarian reform program as compared with the just compensation requirement of expropriating private land for public use and ordinary commercial land transactions, he said.
Pimentel suspected that the payment of unusually huge amounts of compensation to certain landowners was the product of “sweetheart deals” that had been entered into between some public officials and the landowners.
He said there “is an emerging consensus” among legislators to pass the law to extend the CARP but the Senate, in particular, could not act speedily on the bill because a lot of information remained missing.
“I think the senators are also pragmatic in the sense that they understand that this program has to go on. But as I said the presentation of information on CARP is not yet complete,” Pimentel said.
He said at this time it was not clear where the government would get the P162 billion that the Department of Agrarian Reform wanted to continue and complete the CARP.
Pimentel said the funding issue would need a redefinition of “just compensation” for private agricultural lands that were compulsorily covered by CARP or voluntarily sold to the government for redistribution to farmer-beneficiaries.
“Of what use is the extension of the CARP law if there is no funding? The funding issue is very important and that is anchored on what the term ‘just compensation’ means,” Pimentel said.
Reported by: Sol Jose Vanzi
© Copyright, 2003
by PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE
All rights reserved